climbs Since then the moral issue is a credibility debate on the question whether a man ExDR. KTzG has now acted in more or less conscious intention to deceive or not. And lo and behold: once again the only way a conservative delinquent by vehement imply a choice alternative to fumble his head out of the loop. Or less cryptically
Dear too stupid as a criminal because of the stupid who Doktorn is, can still remain Minister ( says Angie ) . As far as the general discussion as a success of this strategy is worth, because no one believes because he eigendlich consists curiously not serious about the disastrous moral consequences of this statement apart.
developed Seen in the light finally just the principle of presumption of innocence most politically explosive. must in fact be only ausgegengen them to all that this effective recycling of 50-95% vol no malice is based - on the contrary: Every programmer knows the value of reusable code . The fact that licenses were injured (to stay in the picture), it may safely be considered generous, because it is not really the problem.
weighs much more difficult for someone who is apparently already while writing this work as a person part of public life, was the question of responsibility . "Gross technical mistakes" are in the trade as "gross negligence" . But even if this were not a moral flaw, as long as he risked his own only reputation and title. But it is by no means: Who in this public situation grossly negligent act (ie an unnecessary risk tacitly accepted in taking ) also compromised the reputation of his supervisor's and his university. As a public person or damaging their reputation and resources of his office and his party and its allies added. Last but not least obstructs this continued Taktiererei the effective governance and ultimately harms all citizens and democracy in general.
who grew up in a time when the political leaders for 16 years her personal "honor" above their oath of office could be, used to a certain degree of criminal intent in the political staff. Of course it is outrageous and so on, but on the other hand, such people are at least reasonably predictable. But if someone sebst seemingly be too stupid to look over the fatal consequences of his negligence driven by vanity, it must possible by a government responsibility be quickly removed.
The real scandal is but the fact that he manages just over this fatal presumption of innocence, the responsibility to withdraw . Without the title it could in principle even try again to write a thesis! Much better was the only assessment of his work would have to cancel, and require him to drive his title to - but with the addition "plagiatus causa :
Dr. (pc) K.-T. Guttenberg
This would be done but the burden of proof is sufficient. The copies sold would of course be provided as part of a recall is in compliance with stickers ...
