socialism was unfair, because ownership and responsibility with third party was that had no relation to the object in the local situation. It failed because the righteous could not be determined.
In other words, it is his failed corruption.
To think you could train people was in fact quite silly, but the state of learning theory corresponded to the time when this theory was formed.
capitalism is unjust, because ownership and responsibility can be separated. The only owner has no relation and the local manager does not make it. He has survived because justice is not provided.
He will fail, that justice can not be determined.
In other words, he will fail because of the greed .
Only if the property is coincident with the interests of existential responsibility and the ability to act the individual sufficient to enable a form of interactive justice. Only then it makes sense to the subject matter of the executive of a sanction to conduct an assessment of the intention to change. If the individual has to bear primary responsibility only extended to the property on personality alone, always all rights in the hands of the actors. Because under this directive any form of cooperation would be possible and beneficial, corruption is impossible, however, for systematic reasons. (Corruption in this sense of ownership of an advantage for the provision itself is no responsibility taken.)
If one then if appropriate, before Property not only give but also to put this would be to form possibly even time or territory as a form of classical communism, but then no longer necessary for the manufacture of justice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment